1

I have a problem with significant slowdown in writing and reading files on Windows Server 2012, the equipment is HP ML350p gen8. Accounting, payroll and spreadsheet programs have a very big problem with reading and writing files. It's probably related to updates or it's just a coincidence.

I turned off the firewall
I uninstalled WithSecure Elements EPP
I entered it into regedit:

NtfsDisableEncryption 1
DisableLeasing 1
EnableOplocks 0

These settings didn't work

The problem after the restart is that it does not give me the Domain network right away and the public network, I change it manually using the PowerShell command: simply restart the network interface.

Ping host to server is suspicious

Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.x: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

ping server to host is good

Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.85: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

xcopy . \Server\files\DB\ very slow

The disks in the controller show without errors

I will rule out a network failure over the weekend, switch the server to another switch and one host, and then I will test it. For now, I have transferred several databases to another computer.

Please help me, what else should I do, reinstall the network card, maybe something with SMB, I don't know...

best regards SW


Maybe that's where the problem lies...

PS C:\Users\Administrator.INT> fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo D:
NTFS Volume Serial Number :       0xc498b67198b6619a
NTFS Version   :                  3.1
LFS Version    :                  2.0
Number Sectors :                  0x000000008bb83fff
Total Clusters :                  0x00000000117707ff
Free Clusters  :                  0x00000000096b4ba2
Total Reserved :                  0x00000000000001f0
Bytes Per Sector  :               512
Bytes Per Physical Sector :       512
Bytes Per Cluster :               4096
Bytes Per FileRecord Segment    : 1024
Clusters Per FileRecord Segment : 0
Mft Valid Data Length :           0x0000000047ac0000
Mft Start Lcn  :                  0x00000000000c0000
Mft2 Start Lcn :                  0x0000000000000002
Mft Zone Start :                  0x000000000d35d240
Mft Zone End   :                  0x000000000d3699a0
Resource Manager Identifier :     0E53E329-90B3-11E3-93EA-9C8E9956074E

Mft Valid Data Length : 0x0000000047ac0000

Isn't this sometimes too much value? I'm not sure if I'm counting correctly...

0000000047ac0000 this hexadecimal 1202454528 / (1024*1024) = 1146,75 MB Raid5 -> 3 SaS 15K/h. full capacity is 1200GB allocated 25% read to 75% write in P420i controller.

Maybe I don't have too much cache, physically it shows 1.09GB, physically the disk is 60% full...

does anyone have any ideas?

best regards SW


I checked the entire network, isolated the server on a small gigabit switch with one host to check the transfer speed and still the same. By the way, I replaced two disks with larger ones in raid one. and I added some memory and put new thermal paste on the processor. Could someone tell me what to check to find any problems or reasons for the slowdown? I suspect a network card, maybe raid 5 disks, maybe a problem with the cache of these disks, maybe the controller, or incorrectly assigned permissions, I don't know...

best regards SW

PS.

I have one more question: how to check these versions?

https://images92.fotosik.pl/698/2c259aeabe00ab73.jpg

New contributor
SebekW is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
  • 1
    Both the server and the OS are out of support. Have you considered migrating to a new supported server and OS?
    – joeqwerty
    Dec 1 at 14:48

0

Browse other questions tagged .